but think about this eshmun.
quasar should need less time than alliance to prepare because quasar is saying that something doesn't exist i.e. a spot market plus whatever.
if you are saying something doesn't exist then it doesn't take much effort to say here is the evidence that it's nonexistent because there would be less data that would be needed to be sifted through relative to all the historical data.
alliance should need more time than quasar. alliance would need to put together info relating to the here and now plus all the historical references which would take more time.
so not only is there a disequilibrium at the first stage mining area but there is a disequilibrium between the legal teams, if you believe what is being said.
maybe quasar will not be ready for trial by april 7, but why?
also as reported by our court attendees last time around Justice Stanley seemed quite ruthless with regard to instructing quasar that they get on with the business of making sure their witnesses were ready to go or something along those lines. this time around Justice Stanley seems quite accommodating of quasar.
maybe everyone is on the same page. not saying this is bad or anything. lmao
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- Ann: Trial Date Change
Ann: Trial Date Change, page-9
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm