This is some of the most disgraceful exploration reporting I've...

This is some of the most disgraceful exploration reporting I've seen in a long time.
On the left results from 24th April, and on the right 21st March.

• TR24-04, -06, -10 and -12 results are reported differently in both announcements. These clowns don't even know their own drill holes.

Dykes 1 & 4 likely unviable. Dyke 5 has potential with strike extension.





Dyke 5:

• 115m known mineralised strike
• Hole 5 (far east) intersected NSR - this does not indicate the pegmatite is closed, rather there isn't spodumene above cut-off. Likely open east, west and at depth.
• Dip angle: 55°

Dyke 4:

• Known mineralised length 101m
• Likely the pegmatite is open east, west and at depth however poorly mineralised evidenced by KS24-004, KS24-008, KS24-009, KS23-011 KS23-012, KS23-014 KS24-001 and KS24-002 all being NSI.
• Dip angle: 67°

Pink drillholes = No Significant Intersection