Ann: Triton Minerals Webcast, page-48

Sorry Oz but it seems like you're cherry picking data here that doesn't tell the whole story. The arbitrary dates that you pick to compare share price between the three companies you chose heavily favour TON's story.

Can you explain why you chose the date December 13, 2013 for the two year shareprice analysis? Thats not wholly two years, so if you go back and look at share price differences as of October 16, 2013, the respective SPs are as follows:
TON - 0.053
MNS- 0.041
SYR - 2.92

As at your date of December 13, 2013, SPs were as you stated;
TON - 0.052
MNS - 0.20
SYR - 2.55

In those two months that you have excluded from your two year analysis, the respective gains (losses) were:
TON - (0.948%)
MNS - 387.8%
SYR - (1.2749%)

So as of October 16, 2015, the two year analysis of share price increase (decrease) from October 16, 2013, give the respective values;

TON - 305.66%
MNS - 839.024%
SYR - 2.12%

Again, with the March 2015 analysis, can you please explain why you chose a 7 month timeframe as opposed to a traditional 3, 6 or 12 month timeframe (as the market operates on a quarterly basis and multiples of such)?

A 6 month analysis of SP from October 16, 2015 would give a share price date of April 16, 2015. As at that date, the respective SPs were;

TON - 0.355
MNS - 0.235
SYR - 3.48

The 6 month analysis to October 16 from April 16 shows the respective gains (losses);

TON - (78.5%)
MNS - 63.83%
SYR - (9.48%)

I feel that the benchmarks against which you compare TON's share price are biased and do not accurately reflect the story that has been played out in the graphite sector over the long, medium and short term. However, this is just my personal interpretation of the data and am happy to open this up for discussion.

Disclosure; I currently hold MNS as of June 2015 and held TON from August 2014 until 7th October 2015, and have not ever held SYR