Anyway, I don't disagree about scale. Area 51 looks promising. 223 isn't closed off in any direction and it looks like 51 and 223 are the same structure so theres opportunity all along that line. I think a game changer for this project would be a smaller deposit at or close to surface that would generate cash from the start to fund the overburden removal at 223. You said it's economical, is there a PFS or something that i missed?
Anyway, I don't disagree about scale. Area 51 looks...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BGD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
25.0¢ |
Change
0.010(4.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $54.66M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 25.0¢ | 26.5¢ | 25.0¢ | $69.46K | 276.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 30764 | 24.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 26.0¢ | 44335 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.57pm 31/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BGD (ASX) Chart |