Two things 1. Is it really necessary for the company to put out...

Two things

1. Is it really necessary for the company to put out an ASX Announcement that they are opposed to being removed?

2. The 'unauthorized' correspondence would not have been necessary if the company had have properly included an unmarked proxy in its mail out to the shareholders so shareholders could make up their own mind. Instead, both proxy forms had the 'against' box pre-marked. The correspondence is completely appropriate.

Regarding the 'strategy' questions, please refer to the posts under 'Drill PEP 11 now'

Oh, and if you want to see a definition of 'deceptive conduct' I refer you to the Spectre Capital emails and website. There are thousands of investment and advisory groups, but this one is unique in that it has no address, no email, no phone number, no clients, no projects, no board or key personnel except 'johnathon bridges' who cannot be found, even on LinkedIn. With offices in New York City and Dubai, their only advise and product is to write a few disparaging 'reports' on a few micro-cap companies on the ASX with such professional language like 'sensitive little soul' and 'chewbacca defence'.