Eire, I have always welcomed your comments, (mostly) they are needed and provide balance. In regards to the abuse, checking activity stream it has shown me who has supported that abuse, and am surprised at three of the names, anyway that’s people opinion that they are entitled too.
I cringe when posters singled out, regardless of justified or not, (I’m use to it) as per jay a example, that could have been handled, imo, my putting on ignore or not replying too.
As you have backed up your views I believe I have backed up mine by my reasoning and insights, imo.
I 100% disagree that negative view points outweigh the positive, your posts always get multiple tu’s and mine, next to none , you tu chillys post that said ‘deservedly so’ on this issue, just saying why I have been surprised at who tu’s these posts, as per ‘I am a liar’ post., the first one.
Have I called WP a ‘liar’ about the NO CR, the cash flow positive forecasts ect?, yet IF I made a mistake OR not??
History is very relevant and shows; partners ARE needed ASAP, funds absolutely needed (as always), the consequences of a major holder leaving, all exactly the same hurdles that need to be overcome in the immediate future.
Yes the company has progressed massively in regards to the IP, in most other metrics the exact opposite. Getting that IP to this stage has cost RIS horrendously, those who can’t afford to average down?, bad luck! No need to detail that cost. It also niggles to that this has generated no hype at all up to date, why?
By and by I don’t think my views are emotional, just a very pragmatic look at the reality, hard not to ‘hit out’ sometimes though.
Btw; posters do seem to overlook a lot of what I have said, but never mind. Sp should be at $50, what could rerate the company examples.
I do believe a deal/s on the cards, because a CR at these levels would be a very undesired outcome when it could have been done at $5 plus not that long ago.
PS; a hardly a rabbit for having the fortitude to express my unpopular view point.
Expand
(20min delay)