CCZ 10.0% 0.5¢ castillo copper limited

Ann: Up to 9% Copper in Big One Deposit Assays, page-15

  1. 1,572 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 343
    @eastwest101

    I doubt that the WME drilling is in the right location. In the JORC tables, WME effectively said "we know where it is on surface" and "we believe it is near vertical". In spite of the above the WME holes are plotted such that not one of them intersects the vertical projection of the surface expression. The hole collars can no longer be found in the field.

    The drilling of last year and this year has only been located by hand-held GPS. It is clear that holes 201, 202 and 203 were drilled too far south and didn't hit the mineralised zone. However all of them would have hit the zone of mineralisation below today's 'fault' as they all ended north of the collar of 301.

    As for the drill holes which are the focus of today's release:

    A week ago I queried the collar coordinates and hole orientations- they were wrong and I was emailed the 'correct' data:

    Drill Order

    SiteID

    Easting (GDA94)

    Northing (GDA94)

    Collar (mAHD)

    Total Depth (m)

    Grid Azimuth (deg)

    Dip (from hor.)

    Drilling Days

    Notes

    1

    1

    BO_315RC

    335413

    7880315

    159.4

    80

    328.0

    -57.8

    3.0

    201RC (previously 50m)

    2

    2

    BO_316RC

    335423

    7880298

    159.0

    155

    349.3

    -71.9

    1.5

    202RC (previously 82m)

    3

    3

    BO_317RC

    335394

    7880291

    157.8

    125

    339.0

    -61.0

    2.0

    306RC (previously 107m)

    4

    Hitch 2 (Progress to 14th July)

    Drill Order

    Site ID

    Easting (GDA94)

    Northing (GDA94)

    Collar (mAHD)

    Total Depth (m)

    Grid Azimuth (deg)

    Dip (from hor.)

    Drilling Days

    Notes

    1

    4

    BO_318RC

    335432

    7880284

    158.8

    203

    333

    -73

    1.5

    203RC (previously 103m)



    Today's release has the following:

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/3400/3400598-61ef4b4d1403f81fdffade81e6bdb6e7.jpg

    You can see that 315 has a different bearing and 316 has a different dip.

    A quick look at Figure 3, the section in today's release shows that neither 315 nor 316 is plotted at the dip shown in Figure A1. Hole 301 was drilled at about 60 degrees. Holes 315 and 316 are plotted at 78 degrees. A little bit of Pythagorus puts 301 and 315 collars 14m apart but here they are plotted 26m apart. Hole 316 is also appears to be incorrectly located on the section.

    Why do they keep pushing this halo zone? 100ppm and 1500ppm are not going to make anyone any money.

    44m x 1.19% - 14m x 3.55% = 30m @ 0.09%, 900ppm PAYDIRT!!!!


    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/3400/3400686-f74b27d44241a36d844063c1b8b3f985.jpg








 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add CCZ (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.