The entries across the top of these pegmatite samples are the...

The entries across the top of these pegmatite samples are the depth, correct? if so when I went back through their 2016 announcements, they never reported lithium mineralisation in the re-assaying/sampling of any of the historical cores deeper than 340m.

The top one appears to be ~128m deep, it screams spod by the look of it.
I'm assuming this is the correlating assay, I couldn't find any other mention of Li intersection at this depth from the historical cores assayed/sampled:


The bottom one appears to be ~493m deep, as I mentioned there was no reporting of Li intersections that deep in any of the historical cores so my conclusion was this was just a pegmatite intersection with no Li mineralisation.

These are the announcements with all the sample tables and subsequent assays for the historical holes:
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ann-mt-holland-lithium-potential-confirmed-kdr-ax.2776006/
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ann-spectacular-lithium-assays-at-mt-holland-project-in-wa-kdr-ax.2783199/
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ann-mt-holland-emerges-as-significant-lithium-discovery-kdr-ax.2812954/

I'm interested here because you seem so bullish but I'm struggling to find any redeeming aspects of this announcement except the size of the pegs, and maybe a couple m's of the visuals provided.