not a holder here but just thinking out loud. I don't understand if it was maq bank that made the final decision to call in receivers and or stop production. Surely without the hedge the mine would have been somewhat profitable surely???
Even if only a minor profit without hedge obligations it would have been worth keeping the mine going to generate some positive cashflow?
Ann: Update from Receivers and Managers, page-114
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CAI (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $93.67M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| CAI (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable