Ann: Update in relation to Half-Year Financial Statements, page-9

The conflicting statement in note 10 was the subject of at least one complaint to the ASX, that I know for a fact.
So this update is a response to ASX enquiries, not a self correction after realising the error

The point of the complaint was to clarify whether the $410,000 commitment to Pune is currently binding, but in true LWP style it has been left in doubt still. Using various conditions precedent in the "update" is sufficiently vague to allow any selected outcome they choose.