If someone wants to sell their shares and move on, why should BRK pay them more than it has to? Why reward sellers with more cash than necessarily to move them out and cancel their shares? The people selling out and moving on no longer want to be invested in the company, so to let them out as cheaply as possible is logical.
All the whingers on here presumably bought their shares at the lowest price they figured they could get, but harp on that BRK should seek to pay more, not less.
Yes, the SP sucks. It is what it is. That’s the stockmarket for you. Things can take time. Lose patience, lose money.
Ok whingers, pile on. I couldn’t care less.
Puddy
If someone wants to sell their shares and move on, why should...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRK (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
0.001(4.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $52.41M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.2¢ | 1.2¢ | 1.2¢ | $50.76K | 4.351M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | 31576711 | 1.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2¢ | 8606718 | 16 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.36am 19/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRK (ASX) Chart |