The buyback notice says the highest price that could have been paid was 0.4578, which means a NAV value calculation of 0.5084 if it is at a 10% discount.
The weekly NTA was declared as 0.67 in the previous announcement.
What is the explanation for the difference, ignoring market moves between the two calculations which would be real but insignificant?
Note 2 in the weekly NTA refers to contingent consideration but I can't imagine it is that much... Is my understanding of the maximum price to be paid (10% discount to NAV) incorrect?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Update - Notification of buy-back - LSX
LSX
lion selection group limited.
Add to My Watchlist
2.15%
!
95.0¢

The buyback notice says the highest price that could have been...
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
95.0¢ |
Change
0.020(2.15%) |
Mkt cap ! $134.0M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
95.0¢ | 96.5¢ | 93.5¢ | $179.6K | 189.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 10449 | 94.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
95.0¢ | 20000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 5000 | 1.000 |
4 | 11267 | 0.950 |
1 | 654 | 0.945 |
1 | 335 | 0.940 |
4 | 15581 | 0.935 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.950 | 20000 | 1 |
0.965 | 11819 | 1 |
0.970 | 50000 | 1 |
0.980 | 55284 | 3 |
0.990 | 14420 | 3 |
Last trade - 15.59pm 17/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LSX (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
RC1
REDCASTLE RESOURCES LIMITED
Ronald Miller, Non-Executive Director
Ronald Miller
Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online