STO 1.16% $6.84 santos limited

Ann: Update - Notification of buy-back - STO, page-6

  1. 9,372 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 863
    This is looking like terrible messaging - world investors will exit Australian oil and gas companies if this comes to fruition? Labor going hard to soften up public opinion tugging at heartstrings of woke people and teh "entitled" public who all want 100% green energy tomorrow but don't want to pay for it or realise it isn't avaliable at any cost and all done not to affect their lifestyle and feel good vibe .


    Friend has just sent me the " messaging " in Australian Press from Labor politicians - following a script. Think from herald.
    Are the government serious or are they just playing with teh Aussie gullible public who are led to believe those nasty oil and gas companies are the problem?

    Targetting 1 industry is a very dangerous game and so it painting it as evil.

    So government got agreement to guarantee supply and gas companies have changed spending and business to achieve that and still meet export contracts.
    Government believes that somehow the guarantee of extra supply magically changes the price????
    Well that phallacy just failed as price is dictated by world market - that is parity pricing and so we comply with all our bloody trade rules.
    Governemnt is 100% aware gas producers are not restricting supply to increase price locally or internatonally .
    Now governemnt wants price control at producer level???? Seriously they got supply and now they want to dictate price or the threat is they will stop exports? Even if they stop increased exports pricing will still be on world parity pricing - it is not milk that goes off . If you can't get suitable price for gas you leave it in ground and shut in well or no longer bring on new supply.

    You can't build and operate the gas infustructure in Australia based on demand from Australia itself especially when govt is trying to stop gas being used. If teh gas infustructure capital burden was only for Australian gas without any exports we would havehigher gas prices The ecconomy of scale export gave us allowed infustructure with 20 year plus pay off to be installed and maintained.

    Did the Australian governemnt ever get past grade 6 at school? Will any tax or levy be temporary or permanent?


    By Mike Foley

    Australia’s gas exporters are creating a “glut of greed problem” and failing to hear Australians’ concerns over soaring energy prices, according to federal Industry Minister Ed Husic.

    During a Radio National appearance, the Labor MP said the gas contract prices now being offered to manufacturers are continuing to rise following a “heads of agreement deal” with Resources Minister Madeleine King – which was designed to guarantee supply and ensure there was no shortfall in the local market.

    Power prices are soaring, with electricity bills forecast to rise 30 per cent next year and gas prices 20 per cent.

    Yesterday, shadow treasurer Angus Taylor said that the primary goal of government has to be “to get the price down [and] the key to that, it’s economics 101, [is] get more supply in, that’s how markets work”.

    But Husic said new gas production would take years to bring online and “the biggest focus long term is the price mechanism” to force gas exporters to sell cheaper gas into the local market.

    The Labor MP added that the onus is on gas companies to offer cheaper prices to avoid harsh regulations.

    “They are not taking this issue seriously. They’re not picking up the signals, [they’re] completely tone-deaf,” he said.


    then
    Chalmers speach yesterday

    We have crossed a threshold’: Oil and gas taxes in Chalmers’ sights


    Chalmers, speaking to the Melbourne Institute on Wednesday, said the surge in energy prices meant the government was contemplating options that would have been unpalatable just a few years ago.


    “As someone who is a relatively reluctant intervener in markets, for me, and for my colleagues, I think we have crossed a threshold where everybody in our cabinet - and I think most people in the Australian community - accept ... when the price is expected to become so extraordinarily high that they risk strangling industries, then we need to do something about it,” he said.

    Loading

    “If there’s something sensible, responsible, but also meaningful that we can do to take some of the sting out of these high prices, then obviously we’ll consider doing that.”

    Data to be released on Thursday by the Australian Tax Office, covering tax paid by the nation’s largest businesses, shows commodity prices feeding huge amounts of tax into the federal budget but little from the taxation of petroleum and gas.

    In 2020-21, large public mining companies paid a combined $32.3 billion in tax, a 29 per cent jump on the $25 billion paid in 2019-20. The increase was largely driven by a spike in iron ore prices.


    The nation’s largest banks paid $15.2 billion in tax, up $1.1 billion, while large businesses across the entire wholesale, retail and services sector paid $15.3 billion.

    The same data showed just 10 large businesses paid a combined $926 million in petroleum resource rent tax (PRRT). It was up on the $881.1 million paid by 12 corporate entities in 2019-20.


    A Treasury working party, formed under then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg in late 2018 but put on hold during the COVID pandemic, has been revived to consider transfer pricing of gas under the PRRT system. It is explicitly looking at how extreme profits are taxed during periods of high prices.

    Chalmers said while PRRT was expected to lift a little this year and next due to the surge in oil and gas prices, more could be raised.


    “I think there is an appetite in the Australian community to see if that tax can operate more effectively,” he said.

    Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor said the government should focus on policies that pumped more gas into the country’s power network.


    “Our focus is to get the price down, not to tax more. The primary goal here right now has to be to get the price down (and) the key to that, it’s economics 101, (is) get more supply in, that’s how markets work,” he said.

    But the PRRT is already “fit for purpose”, argues Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association Chief Executive Samantha McCulloch, who noted the tax had been reviewed four times since 2017.

    “The PRRT is already a profits tax delivering a growing return for Australian taxpayers – totaling around $40 billion since its introduction and another $11 billion across the forward estimates in last week’s budget.”

    Loading

    Woodside, which accounted for just under 10 per cent of Australia’s LNG production for export last year, released a statement after Chalmers’ speech saying they needed “stable tax and fiscal settings in order to make the large, long-term investments that support energy security, decarbonisation and economic growth”, and that the current PRRT regime “operates as intended”.

    “We paid more than A$700 million in Australian taxes, royalties and excise in the first half of 2022 and about A$12 billion since 2011,” a spokesman for the company said




 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add STO (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.