Again, it's CE's role to display some foresight, and carry out proper due diligence. As many people have pointed out to you already, it's not the decision not to exercise the warrants that is the issue. It's that up until a few days ago, CE perceived that cash flow opportunity to exist, which potentially means that we should have been raising more than the tiny amount we just did. The fact that he wasn't across this detail is ridiculous, but the fact that this is on top of several other recent date errors is even more concerning. But you can't bring yourself to criticise these f*ckups, for obvious reasons (see my previous post).
Fun fact - Anyone participating in the SPP will need a 33% raise just to get back to break even, and their attached option needs a 100% raise to break even. Care to comment on the work of genius that is the SPP, or are you just going to look past that one as well, because CE can do no wrong?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)