Sounds to me like you have never rented an office neither understood how physical mail works. I don't have a goose in the game but CST's legal cousel needs to email them in the minimum that proceedings were initiated against them and that the court would have emailed them and tried to reach them as well. If they were unaware of BUD's counsel, the email should have gone to the CEO.
If the proceedings are reinstated CST"s counsel can bid goodbye to cost orders because they didn't have a shred of professionalism that is if that is what really happened. Not to mention that the sitting judge would slap them on their wrist for being dodgy as well. A lot of litigation is based on reputation of the litigant and this sounds like CST expect to reach settlement with BUD. No wonder debt financing is shadier than buying drugs on the street. No matter how much you read through their docs there is something that you always have done or not done that leads to this outcome.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BUD
- Ann: Update on Dispute with CST
Ann: Update on Dispute with CST, page-39
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 36 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)