Hi shol------------------ Together they no better statements for...

Hi shol------------------
Together they no better statements for AVR's DurAUR--- and just my take on them ------------however I am with you and no detriment to your comments ........
Out now ------ Thanks fot the banter

I believe Dr Asgar since first experience with DuAUR can see the DuAUR, at this point in time, being the 'BEST on the PLANET'

Question to all AVRers-------------- If placed in the unenviable position of needing a h/valve ---------- what would you choose? What will Doctors in time recommend.
What will our competitors need to keep their $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$'s coming in ????

Latest :- Dr Asgar:-
'..........................................allows health care professionals to access unlicensed medical devices, such as DurAVR™, for emergency use
when conventional therapies have failed, are unavailable, or are unsuitable to treat a patient.
This data set of valve-in-valve patients highlights the impact of the DurAVR™ valve biomimetic design
by restoring these patients’ hemodynamics to the performance of their initial surgical
valve and is very encouraging for the wave of valve-in-valve patients that are coming in the future”.

Both statements -great but give me this last one as it confirms '... wave .... THAT ARE COMING' will take this last statement as more of
'it is going to happen'

over ' may help ' and ' probably '
Earlier statement:- Dr Asgar

.............,“As a clinician, it’s a great opportunity to have access to a technology that ' may ' help us with what is ' probably ' going to be a tsunami of valve-in-valve procedures that we are going to have to do”."These patients are in a challenging situation and are in need of a better option than what is commercially available.
DurAVR™ delivered an outstanding result with meaningful patient benefits".