shet!!! I think you're right.
I just read ANS's version in their ann and it sounds like this is the case. Where paperwork has been submitted for the remittance (maybe late vs due date) and that SDL weren't satisfied with that and would hard proof, which could only be funds actually in SDL accounts.
This would line up with ANS meeting with ASX because it was ASX requirement in terms of proof of funding.
Wow if correct.
Ann: Update on Extension with AustSino Agreement, page-8
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?