Have I got this right?
Some of you appear to be saying that the board of IIQ have decided not to progress research work on the BARD 1 Lung Cancer detection technology just to avoid having to pay Irmgard Irminger-Finger a possible bonus?
You're saying they would rather hold back the success of the company (and possibly even the survival of the company) just so they can cheat her out of a potential big pay day?
Spite in front of profits?
Doing something like that is more than just being small-minded. It would also make the company very unpopular with the their directly employed scientists, and research associates in the university sector.
Is that logical?
Have I got this right?Some of you appear to be saying that the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IIQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
58.0¢ |
Change
0.025(4.50%) |
Mkt cap ! $61.20M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 57.5¢ | 58.0¢ | 57.0¢ | $53.04K | 92.39K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 160 | 58.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 58.5¢ | 6874 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.56pm 27/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IIQ (ASX) Chart |