the other thought is they probably tried it on the federal court first as they knew the state court would be stacked against them. the broader economic benefit to the state for developing this industry will be massive (hence the national significance status approval). So what ever the percieved imbuggerance on the aggrieved party will be weighed against this collective benefit... worst case AGR have to sprinkle some cash on a local farmer or two... kinda how you can build a highway through a national park if the collective benefit is high enough....
obviously not a lawyer, or even a brazilianbut seems like this is a big circle jerk to squeeze some cash for a farmer or 2.
the other thought is they probably tried it on the federal court...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
