You have stated that "RCE pulled out of the FDA process because...

You have stated that "RCE pulled out of the FDA process because it couldn't/wouldn't meet the FDA standards"

So i guess either you have some sort of evidence that this is a fact, or is this just an opinion. Could you clarify which please?

Also you have repeatedly claimed that Rce do not reveal bad news or bad data. So i guess my second question would be do you believe there is some bad data or bad news that has been uncovered in this burns trial but has not been revealed? Covered up by staff or researchers at Fiona Stanley hospital regarding current trials?
If so do you know for a fact or is it an opinion?

I am hoping that you understand I am very happy to hear negative facts or opinions and would like to be able to clarify or question that information in the interest of open discussion. I am not trying to berate anyone, although my coments might have seemed that way as they were written in frustration..

From your comment "some believe in the nonsense it is cheaper and easier" i am assuming you were referencing my earlier comments regarding IND and FDA approval can be gained at later stages of trials. I was going to post Evidence of this from FDA website but doesnt seem there is much point, as long as i am happy that information is correct.
My comments that i believe this is the path being taken by RCE were based on information directly from company sources and from FDA published infotmation on foreign trials. Are you suggesting you have company sources that disagree with this?