This is why MIN want an in depth view to the commercial arrangements between PLS and GLC to see if they need to cover PLS for all of the arranged benefits of the offtake or if they can get away with just paying for the lithium ore. I feel Ken would have covered this and that is why we have such an in depth offtake agreement.
This is why MIN want an in depth view to the commercial...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 609 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.05 |
Change
-0.100(3.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.185B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.13 | $3.15 | $3.02 | $74.55M | 24.33M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 89482 | $3.04 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.05 | 37502 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PLS (ASX) Chart |