I think this is a moot point whether ROFR is transferable to MIN, as different parties can and could come to different contracts due to the nature of who they are dealing with; it's not as if a party to the contract is a generic element, it inflects upon the nature of the agreement. And GAM should keep it or give it up.
If PLS we're dealing with MIN writing up a ROFR maybe MIN would want a ROFO, that's where MIN might need to be careful making retroactive demands if that's the case.
I just think MIN & Co. are buying time as they need it for something else....
MIN: Give up, it ain't gonna work. Play nice, hah?
I think this is a moot point whether ROFR is transferable to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 345 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.05 |
Change
-0.100(3.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.185B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.13 | $3.15 | $3.02 | $74.55M | 24.33M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 89482 | $3.04 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.05 | 37502 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PLS (ASX) Chart |