@Dollarsandsense (replying this way - 'Reply' button appears to...

@Dollarsandsense (replying this way - 'Reply' button appears to be broken...)

> The fundamentals of the project in this current economic climate still a question mark.
>
> I suspect the intricacy and complexity of this project has become far too convoluted and complex over time that it is
> not economically viable (or exceedingly difficult to get all the moving parts together concurrently).

So why do you think GW has taken it on? Serious question - not baiting, just wondering why you think someone you (seem to) consider to be astute would invest both time and money (and not insignificantly) in a project that's (in your opinion) not economically viable? I'm a shareholder, but I confess to knowing very little about what it takes to get something like this up-and-running. Do you have special knowledge that GW doesn't have, or doesn't have access to? I suppose the obvious answer is that GW doesn't share your opinion, but why would he not if he knows what you know? Just optimism vs pessimism? Or optimism vs realism?