Ann: Update on XingYun Lake court case in China, page-25

What an odd post and this sentence is a complete cracker.

"I am no apologist for the past..."??? Feeling a little guilty or some remorse for your actions here perhaps? Maybe getting the regulstor to do a quick digital audit trace would reveal who you are to even post such a comment. Might flick them an email and suggest as such as the posts from this one have been coincidentally timely but rather awkward ever since arrival on the PET scene.

As for the rest of the comment "...but it is the past." That's a beautiful patsy that one, right out of a child fairytale. The past will remain so and will continue to hamper the company until they address the past matters including the array of conduct issues of past officeholders and now it appears current officeholders included.