I am hoping to see $80m knocked off the up-front capital costs...

I am hoping to see $80m knocked off the up-front capital costs e.g. $40m for the unnecessary contingency and $40m at least on moving the beneficiation plant closer to the pond area or vice versa, and also from switching to using a conveyor belt instead of slurry pipes.

The payback period has increased. How can that be if the IRR has supposedly improved? Are the figures for the payback period in the wrong columns?

The Namibian tax rate is horrendous, but maybe that is a good reason to grant the ECC.