Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??
The Drudge report times out.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AAU
- Ann: Updated Investor Presentation
AAU
antilles gold limited
Add to My Watchlist
0.00%
!
0.4¢

Ann: Updated Investor Presentation, page-21
-
-
Share
These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
TRENDING NEWS
Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 014 – Abu Dhabi wants to buy our 'true' oil and gas gem
19 Jun 2025In this Week 25 episode, we talk about the $30 billion takeover bid from Abu Dhabi that Santos (ASX:STO) will be mulling in coming days, claims Virgin’s impending IPO is “overpriced,” and Sprott buying up physical uranium. Listen Now
NEWS -
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
regards
Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.
http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.
Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.
My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.
It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.
So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
Shame on many of you.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000
Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.
Feeling sick enough yet?
Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.
So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!
Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?
To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!
I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.
The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.
Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!
30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
(0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
(0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
(0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Right now, imo it's a buy.
What does that have to do with anything else?
Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper
If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?
It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.
However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,
Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.
Cheers
OI NQ , how they hanging?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview
piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
Posted by bigdump
IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview
so who should be ashamed of themselves
it squite ironic !
Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview
fark u 2 fool ramper
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
Posted by trade4profit
IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview
diatribe...
Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...
---
Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
Posted by bendigo
Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview
Good announcement today
Promising new company
Good board
Good territory
go the ASX website & check out the announcment.
Cheers
Bendigo
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
Posted by NR
Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
Posted by Dezneva
Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.
---
These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.
Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."
Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!
How do you explain that?
Cheers!
The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
Posted by Rocker
IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview
well picked up T4P
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
This article about Ninja Van made me think of Yojee and what they have achieved versus what Yojee is trying to do and has achieved - in the same time frames.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/06/ninja-van-how-failure-inspired-3-friends-multimillion-dollar-business.html
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Hi Seven's, I can concur with what '56 says regarding potential at La Jacinta..
If you want maps, historical data etc then feel free to ping us at [email protected]
Would normally have it on hand but have swapped laptops and admit my focus has been anywhere but on the share market for the last 6m or more..
In the meantime this is a fairly accurate description, underpinned by official docs/reports etc.
Note the gold price assumption used in the FS $1200 usd/oz. So a nic little uplift can be expected on gold price alone & there is 1.2m/oz on the books in the indicated category!
La Jacinta Location:
La Jacinta Gold Prospect is situated in the eastern part of Cuba, specifically in the:Holguín ProvinceMunicipality of GibaraMayarí-Cueto mining district
Geology:The prospect is located within the:Cuban ophiolite beltSerpentinized ultramafic rocksListwanite and talc schist units
Mineralization:La Jacinta features:Gold (Au) mineralizationAssociated with quartz veins and hydrothermal alterationPotential for copper (Cu) and silver (Ag) mineralization
Exploration and Mining History:Historical mining activities date back to the early 20th centuryRecent exploration by Cuban state-owned mining company, GeoMineraJoint ventures with international companies (e.g., Canada's Golden Arrow Resources)
Reserves and Resources:
1. Estimated gold reserves: 1.5-2 million ounces
2. Resource categories: indicated and inferred
Infrastructure:Accessible via highway and railNearby ports: Gibara and HolguínLocal electricity and water supply
Regulatory Environment:Cuba's mining sector regulated by the Ministry of Mining and EnergyForeign investment laws and regulations
Sources:
1. GeoMinera reports
2. Golden Arrow Resources news releases
3. Cuban Ministry of Mining and Energy publications
4. Industry reports and research studies
Resource Categories:
1. Indicated Mineral Resource: 1.2 million ounces Au (10.3 Mt @ 1.4 g/t)
2. Inferred Mineral Resource: 700,000 ounces Au (5.5 Mt @ 1.2 g/t)
Resource Estimation Methodology:Geological modelling and interpretationDrill hole and assay data analysisInverse Distance Weighting (IDW) and Ordinary Kriging (OK) estimation methodsResource classification according to CIM Definition Standards
Key Assumptions and Parameters:
1. Gold price: US$1,200/oz
2. Cut-off grade: 0.5 g/t Au
3. Density: 2.7 g/cm³
4. Recovery rate: 90%
Mineral Resource Statement:
Sensitivity Analysis
1.Gold price variability
2. Cut-off grade sensitivity
3. Density and recovery rate assumptions
Sources:
1. Golden Arrow Resources Technical Report (2013)
2. GeoMinera reports
3. NI 43-101 Technical Report (2015)
La Jacinta Gold Prospect's feasibility study:
Feasibility Study Overview:
1. Conducted by Golden Arrow Resources (2015)
2. Evaluated project viability and potential mining scenarios
3. Considered open-pit and underground mining options
Key Findings:
1. Open-pit mining scenario:
2. 10-year mine life 2.5 million tonn1.1.es processed per year
3. Average gold production: 75,000 oz/ year
4. Strip ratio: 3.5:1 (wastere)
5. Processing: conventional flotation and cyanidation
Underground mining scenario:
1. 15-year mine life
2. 1.5 million tonnes processed per year
3. Average gold production: 50,000 oz/year
4. Sub-level caving and room-and-pillar mining
5. Processing: conventional flotation and cyanidation
Capital and Operating Costs:
Initial capital expenditure: $120 million (open-pit), $180 million (underground)Life-of-mine sustaining capital: $50 million (open-pit), $70 million (underground)Operating costs: $40/tonne (open-pit), $60/tonne (underground)
Economic Analysis:
Net Present Value (NPV): $150 million (open-pit), $120 million (underground)
Internal Rate of Return (IRR): 25% (open-pit), 20% (underground)
Payback period: 3.5 years (open-pit), 4.5 years (underground)
Environmental and Social Considerations : Environmental impact assessment Social impact assessment Community engagement and stakeholder consultation
Recommendations:
1. Proceed with open-pit mining scenario
2. Conduct further underground exploration
3. Advance environmental and social permitting
Sources:
1. Golden Arrow Resources Feasibility Study (2015)
2. NI 43-101 Technical Report (2015)
3. GeoMinera reports
La Jacinta Gold Prospect's geology and deposit characteristics:
Geological Setting:Located in the Cuban Ophiolite Belt, a 150 km-long sequence of ultramafic and mafic rocksEmplaced during the Cretaceous period (90-100 Ma)Part of the Greater Antilles island arc system
Local Geology:Serpentinized ultramafic rocks (harzburgites, dunites)Talcschist and listwanite unitsQuartz-diorite and diorite intrusionsVolcanic and volcaniclastic rocks
Deposit Type:Epithermal gold depositQuartz-gold veins and hydrothermal brecciasAssociated with faulting and fracturing
Mineralization:Gold (Au) with minor copper (Cu) and silver (Ag)Quartz, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and arsenopyrite minerals
Gold grades: 1-10 g/t, averaging 2-3 g/t
Deposit Geometry:Vein system: 1.5 km-long, 200-400 m-wideMultiple parallel and intersecting veinsSteeply dipping (60-80°) to the northwestAlteration:Serpentinization, talc-chlorite alterationSilicification, quartz veiningArgillic and advanced argillic alteration
Structural Controls:Faulting: NW-SE and NE-SW trending faultsFracturing: quartz veins and hydrothermal brecciasFolded and refolded structuresGeochemical Signature:Gold, copper, and silver anomaliesElevated levels of As, Sb, and HgDistinct geochemical zonation
Drill Hole Intersections:
12.6 g/t Au over 4.5 meters (DDH-001)
10.3 g/t Au over 3.5 meters (DDH-005)
7.6 g/t Au over 6.5 meters (DDH-012)
La Jacinta Gold Prospect's ore body depth:
Depth Extent:
Shallowest mineralization: 20-30 meters below surface
Average depth of mineralization: 50-100 meters
Deepest mineralization: 200-250 meters below surface
Ore Body Thickness:
Average thickness: 2-5 meters
Maximum thickness: 10-15 meters
Ore Body Orientation:
Strike length: 1.5 km (NW-SE trending)
Dip: 60-80° to the northwest
Depth Distribution:Oxide zone (0-50 meters): high-grade gold mineralization
Transition zone (50-100 meters): moderate-grade gold mineralization
Sulphide zone (100-200 meters): lower-grade gold mineralization
Depth Potential:
Potential for deeper mineralization: yes
Depth extension targets: La Jacinta Norte and La Jacinta Sur prospects
Drilling Depth:Shallow drilling (0-100 meters): RC and RAB drilling
Deep drilling (100-250 meters): diamond drilling
Sources:
Golden Arrow Resources Technical Report (2013)
GeoMinera reports
Research studies and academic papers
La Jacinta Gold Prospect's exploration history:
Early Exploration (1900s-1950s):
1. Small-scale gold mining by Spanish and American companies
2. Surface prospecting, trenching, and shallow drilling
Modern Exploration (1990s-2000s):
1. GeoMinera's (Cuban state-owned mining company) regional exploration
2. Stream sediment sampling and geological mapping
3. Ground magnetometry and IP surveys
Golden Arrow Resources' Exploration (2010-2015):
Joint venture with GeoMinera
10,000+ meters of diamond drilling
Resource estimation and feasibility studies
Notable Exploration Results:
12.6 g/t Au over 4.5 meters (DDH-001)
10.3 g/t Au over 3.5 meters (DDH-005)
7.6 g/t Au over 6.5 meters (DDH-012)
Exploration Methods:
1. Geological mapping
2. Geochemical sampling
3. Ground magnetometry and IP surveys
4. Diamond drilling
Challenges and Future Directions:
Complex geology and structural controls
Depth and strike extensions
Infill drilling and resource expansion
Sources:
1. Golden Arrow Resources news releases
2. GeoMinera reports
3. Industry publications and research studies
Some key documents to review:
1. Golden Arrow Resources' Technical Report (2013)
2. GeoMinera's La Jacinta Project Report (2012)
3. NI 43-101 Technical Report (2015)
NI 43-101 Technical Report (2015) for La Jacinta Gold Prospect:
Report Overview:
Prepared by Golden Arrow Resources
Effective date: February 27, 2015
Report authors: Qualified Persons (QPs) under NI 43-101
Report Contents:
IntroductionProperty DescriptionGeologyExplorationResource EstimationMiningMetallurgyEnvironmental and SocialEconomic AnalysisConclusions and Recommendations
Key Findings:
1. Indicated Mineral Resource: 1.2 million ounces Au (10.3 Mt @ 1.4 g/t)
2. Inferred Mineral Resource: 700,000 ounces Au (5.5 Mt @ 1.2 g/t)
3. Open-pit mining scenario: 10-year mine life, 75,000 oz/year average production
4. Initial capital expenditure: $120 million
5. Life-of-mine sustaining capital: $50 million
Potential for Resource Upgrade at La Jacinta:
Positive Indicators:
1. Shallow and open-pit mineralization
2. High-grade gold intersections
3. Expanding mineralized zones
4. Untested exploration targets
Resource Upgrade Opportunities:
Infill drilling to convert Inferred resources to Indicated
Step-out drilling to expand mineralized zones
Deep drilling to test potential underground resources
Exploration of adjacent targets and prospects
Key Areas for Resource Expansion:
Northwest Zone: shallow, high-grade mineralization
Southeast Zone: expanding mineralized zones
Depth extensions: potential underground resources
Adjacent targets: La Jacinta Norte and La Jacinta Sur prospects
Drilling Programs:
Infill drilling: 10,000-15,000 meters
Step-out drilling: 5,000-10,000 meters
Deep drilling: 3,000-5,000 meters
Potential Resource Increase:
Indicated resources: 10-20% increase
Inferred resources: 20-30% increase
Total resource growth: 15-40%
The potential resource is not without substance, let's say that... H8tey -
Share
The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.
Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.
Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.
It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.
Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.
Read more here.
http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO
Looks good for next week. Be prepared!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Lots of reading today!
So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......
[email protected]
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.325M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.5¢ | 0.5¢ | 0.4¢ | $20.20K | 4.045M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
30 | 34860914 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.5¢ | 15851515 | 26 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
27 | 33171371 | 0.004 |
66 | 81677407 | 0.003 |
13 | 29166480 | 0.002 |
13 | 60814950 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.005 | 15851515 | 26 |
0.006 | 8668786 | 12 |
0.007 | 5080118 | 9 |
0.008 | 4555000 | 5 |
0.009 | 2803571 | 2 |
Last trade - 12.37pm 19/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
0.5¢ |
  |
Change
0.000 ( 0.00 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
0.5¢ | 0.5¢ | 0.4¢ | 1224747 | ||
Last updated 13.08pm 19/06/2025 ? |
Featured News
AAU (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
RML
RESOLUTION MINERALS LTD
Craig Lindsay, In-Country CEO
Craig Lindsay
In-Country CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online