Is this why they went back to their September quarterly and...

  1. 102 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 31
    Is this why they went back to their September quarterly and updated it? I believe ASX should be onto this company, as it has shonky stamped all over it. The other clear statement from the auditor was:
    We draw attention to Note 1 in the financial report, which indicates that the Group incurred a net loss of
    $3,482,245 during the year ended 30 June 2020 and, as of that date, the Group’s current liabilities
    exceeded its current assets by $4,739,403. As stated in Note 1, these events or conditions, along with
    other matters as set forth in Note 1, indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant
    doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
    They are basically saying that this company is NOT FINANCIALLY VIABLE! No mention of China. Once the Ballarat loan gets called in they will lose another $2million dollar asset, so Broo will be up the creek without a paddle. There is some buying of shares at the moment, so I gather Kent is hard at the bar conning a few out of their hard earned money, selling them the dream that will never eventuate.
    Apparently this is a legal way to do business in Australia. This company is basically trading insolvent.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.