The logic is sound, but knowing the exact terms would help everyone assess a (minimum) see-through value.
Why don't they release this information like most other companies would?
Also, could someone point me to the break-even costs the company has released? Danpech quoted US$25-30 in previous posts, but I can't seem to find the original source.
As for the lack of the price response in response to Jewell and Rangers, I think the capital structure provides the biggest explanation. Similar dillemma to TPD.
Many thanks in advance.
The logic is sound, but knowing the exact terms would help...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 75 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRK (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $57.27M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 27 | 15058479 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3¢ | 20418896 | 27 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 08.54am 18/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRK (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable