Understand and agree with almost everything you wrote there, and I am certainly no Lonestar cheerleader either. They probably own enough for one spot but are surely taking the piss trying to get 5 on board.
Mgmt communication is poor and it is difficult to accept at face value the "significant corporate interest" statements without something more solid to back them up. Let's face it, the original LOI was settling in X days, then extended, finally rejected, now a new LOI. Why if the last LOI at 300m was unacceptable, is this one even being entertained. Has he gone back to talk to them about raising it? Otherwise, I don't see what would have changed since the last one was rejected. Is the info that we thought was so good, suddenly not so good?
Interesting question. Would letting us know whether the current LOI is from the same company as before break the commercial confidence? No need to name who, just let us know if it from exactly the same interested party.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AZZ
- Ann: USD 300M LOI for Sale of all Permian Assets
Ann: USD 300M LOI for Sale of all Permian Assets, page-36
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AZZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online