sorry DDD but whose spin do you speak of (I hope I have not...

sorry DDD but whose spin do you speak of (I hope I have not misapprehended) as the medical specialists have posted with great clarity today (and historically) on what they see as the likely process - let's give this a few more days for not only potentially additional data but clarification from the conference.
I particularly liked Outlander's comments on the other thread about the conference (as well as Davy and Jov) as to how many scientists put their name to the paper, which is very thought-provoking. It might be of value for interested readers to check that thread again from Friday if not done sso, in view of today.
Prof Fong seems like such a humble man it is entirely possible he is sharing the glow with his co-scientists who have also committed their lives to this work.
Looking it from a management of issues perspective, it can possibly be observed that IMU has released very cautiously in order to manage various stakeholders from the conference release, ASX, FDA, the CoH and its various scientists, as well as the investment market and medical trial environment in which it operates and perhaps in view of potential commercialisation parties. Haven't heard any more statements that our dance card is full for some time now.
Quite frankly it would be like herding cats (or pigeons) at this time and requires immense coordination and discipline. Onwards!!