Obviously you only pick the points to your argument that you...

Obviously you only pick the points to your argument that you choose to support your case, and left out some relevant ones.
What about the point that mondy only posted the cons and not the pros about the company, so how was that a balanced overview, but obviously you didn't see that point.
And how do screenshots in this instance prove the point, another objective opinion, I see?
So if I was critiquing a company that I didn't own shares in ( which I would never do since it isn't my business), I would look at both the pros and cons and balance it up.
I wouldn't just can it stating all the possible negative aspects.à
So i ask again what's the objective here?