Interesting Ann.. I like the look of the hole TRBD013 at Impaler, 400m area looks interesting. Some of the photos were like-wise interesting. A bit disappointed about the hole TRBC111 on the Jasperlite area east of Gossan - have they done much geochem in that area before I wonder?
Also good to see the multi assay reported, though I did note that SFR assay for 27 elements (I checked Monty exploration Anns) and THX assayed for 19 elements. Should THX be assaying for elements that SFR are, like Barium, or Antimony (considered in publications as a possible VMS pathfinder) ??? Anyone have any thoughts on this?
I read from the report that the "Pipes" theory is no longer the theory, and now the theory is that mineralisation has been remobilised. Does anyone have any thoughts on any significance of that (negative or positive?). So now we have a new diagram instead of pipes, we have the dolerite sills and the blobs of mineralisation - well that's why Tony never did a RB 'stick' video part 2!
A comment (just two words actually) that intrigued me on this topic is also right at the end, page 19:
So my question is, what did I miss sorry, when was a VHMS origin for mineralisation at Gossan previously discounted? Anyway, glad to hear it is "still valid"... I'm just wondering if this information about remobilisation and the change in the theory from the pipes changes anything for Gossan.
I might go back over TLM Ann once again, because the Ann from THX today specifically mentioned the dolerite sills at Monty. Anyone else already done so for any insight?
I'm not sure about the microscopic gold inclusions in the pyrite on hole TRBD013, the report claims its highly significant but I'm failing to see how, anyone have better insight than I?
I'm wondering about the negative reaction today too, down 5% straight after the Ann. I'm not trying to be negative here, just trying to understand what's happening really.
Keen to hear more thoughts from everyone
(20min delay)