Ann: Voluntary Suspension, page-217

I've read it. Its not particularly challenging. What I dispute is that trained medical professionals will want to use something that is not particularly convenient (a 14 hour -840m- recording of children?) when they can take a history, use a stethescope and physical examination and their clinical skills to arrive at an accurate diagnosis in a fraction of the time and institute treatment. Its possible I suppose that some paediatricians might use it to monitor children with respiratory problems in hospitals, but if its an extra expense which isn't likely to actually alter the treatment, its hard to see it becoming routine. The information provided is limited and isn't a substitute for skilled clinical care.

I can accept that it could have use in remote areas where normal medical facilities are not available.

We'll see I guess...