Dolcevita appears to read statements and attribute motives with...

Dolcevita appears to read statements and attribute motives with a degree of confirmation bias.

Again: "

For the December 2017 quarter, the Group breached the EBITDA covenant in relation to the PFG loan. ​

At 31 December 2017, as a result of the breach, the loan became payable on demand" ​

You may consider that a minor breach as per the company's line. However, it was not disclosed until a couple of months later which, I opine, was clearly a continuous disclosure breach of listing rules at Dec end.

The debt facility remains $5 million in undrawn funds because of the breaches. That's according to AHZ, not me. Read the extract again.

I patently did not say nor imply licensing would not solve anything. That's your spin. Nor did I express an opinion about the structuring of any licence. Again, that's your posturing.

There's nothing defamatory about any of the comments. For defamation the parties must prove financial loss directly attributable to statements. Go ahead, make my day.