I am not a lawyer but being a shareholder of a suspended stock that has been in litigation with the ASX for two years and counting - I'd suggest that VUL lawyers used defamation laws to achieve a quick decision. Surely this is better than going down the path of using the court system to adjudicate whether Jcrap or VUL are correct re estimated VUL flow rates, etc. By the time the case was decided in this scenario, VUL is likely to be producing lithium and we will all know the actual vs estimated flow rates.
I am not a lawyer but being a shareholder of a suspended stock...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 48 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add VUL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.92 |
Change
0.060(1.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $733.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.85 | $3.94 | $3.85 | $1.004M | 257.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6742 | $4.17 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.72 | 591 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.59pm 30/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| VUL (ASX) Chart |