So what now do we all need to Au $$ ie or Ozz ie change the assumed way of doing busyness> do We now need in busyness allow for foreign law battles to fend off? do We now need to have the highest number of wigs wiggling or as I witnessed winking the Judge? ( Barrs have sign language = hmm?? cough cough? steering at best? Are we now To be judged by peers (gold industry ) or legal industry? or foreign P puppeteers swooping in for in low representing to assume gain? Australian interest lost is it now foreign inteestring as with our cough Justice system ? I$ it our BLIND Justice system got foreigners loading as scales for deeming a not clean cut using its $words. Appealing? as references/ /precedent were they able to be Judged or examined thoroughly ? as how a golden or to be rules there as is it so different. How much weighed on some evidence not the way as TRIAL needs redoing if wronged. Trial is not 2 parties as = 3 needs considering. Contract law is $trOng as laws, but needs both in terms of total agrree meant to be real. As one or both short in terms no matter how much short renders the agree meant accept able, needing change or void, What little breach of one may outscale a larger breach of another. Yes what is not there can not be used but when is used to now be redone as used??? Contracts? The caught now by court = How can non agreed terms be rewritten by a judge in 3 TRIAL ??? as third party writing terms that 2 others need agree in busyness ongoing? has that ever been dONe? = NOT that I am a ware as be ware???? So the old contract breached? $$$? Costs ??? Is there no %%% each way and which the bigger as breach or in that breach and we know whom or how many wigs side the Judge favors = They are meant to be brains = NOT as agreement?? as now = NOT as $$$ hungry foriegners and an ozzie goldie wanting to be a ingot Mills P producer & just waiting??? waiting to clear legal parasites = VAN would be IN$ane to accept a bad deal as inferior may be $eeking = so Judge needs to $et a dangerous P precedent = F Goldies $ake??? Judge orders? Orders we need & they need do as future do??? and if not? contempt of legal or contract or? So in future judge there to see whom being bad in obeying or not his horizon orders = NOT as what may seem a farce??? as $$$ or %%% of what land or earnings? where is that in contract or TRIAL or not? where was that pleaded, examined or tested? as where the honor deems honour able? Law should maybe not be a ass but a P Pass, = last resort and not as offered as was contract as VAN offered??? to seem be deemed favor to litigate? for same offer? wtf = JUSTICE?? what a one P party??? $oap opera CONtinues wiggle wiggle wiggle??? & Judge writ In contracts??? Writ in or written contracted futures??? as fair in future unfor$een (be have ours)??? The judge deserves what can or not served??? as Un or not acceptable by how many of the 3? in TRIAL ? as legitimate accept able? No wonder in conclusion the Judge want the wigs to do the order worder? (as able?) = wiggle wiggle wiggle = NOT
VAN Price at posting:
5.9¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
