Minites of inferior party due ? dues that a second party may put in orders over a third party? No party can legally to my know ledge enter another unagree able party into a contract. = Thus orders required. So as contract seemly if unagree able & unlawful then orders sought by $$$ grubs. Breach of orders seemly contempt of court. The grubby sought greed list and its judging & penalties will be AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC INTEREST$ ? = LOST? So anything judged unlawful is seemly grounds for appeal as reference in above post in Magna Carta reference. So future boundaries judged VAN are to act with inferior??? whom judging & whom what degree %%% fault & penalizing? Legal are not peers in mining= Vango as a rite can reserve its response to maybe need of appeal in its response to the orders that maybe steered wrongly or write & or not. So $$$ & 3 wigs over 1 = Australian Interest & justice = LOST= ??? = Disgusted Go Vango & go ON strength from grubs & OWNED = in justice
VAN Price at posting:
5.6¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
