Law is blind So 3 wigs over 1 coerced the third party to maybe in judge??? $$$ coercing a dysfunctional by the same to be judged functional. So C Re ate and use to rearrange = sue ??? So enter agreement, be dsyfunctional and own legal?? by 3 wigs over one as ? law or 3 wig P power??? had any party been functional ? yet VAN tried yet other? Van = how could obligations be for filled? Now as soon entering in disagreement (seemly unlawful) in to 2 over the 3rd agreement, that may or not as seen be open ended (seemly unlawful) in a gain dis a greed by one and 2 a greed? IS THAT been untested not judge able & UNLAW FULL? Is it simply a greed and a steered judge coerced by 3 wigs over 1 = OR = IS IT AUSTRALIAN GOLD ie $ ??????????????/
VAN Price at posting:
5.6¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
