The main difference between Wilsons and Macquarie is that Wilsons attribute 13 cps (very highly risked) to the exploration potential.
If I understand Macquarie's analysis correctly, they are basically saying that at today's share price you get all the exploration upside for free. Sounds like the definition of an overweight rather than a neutral.
The main difference between Wilsons and Macquarie is that...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
21.3¢ |
Change
-0.003(1.16%) |
Mkt cap ! $607.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 21.5¢ | 21.5¢ | 21.0¢ | $262.0K | 1.231M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 83 | 4572136 | 21.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 21.5¢ | 1970488 | 56 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.15pm 16/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |