Further to this i would draw your attention to 187B clause 2. Where it is stated
"The Communications Access Co-ordinator may declare that subsection 187A.1 applies in relation to a relavant service that a service provider operates."
So its clear that the CAC has deemed Wangle as a service provider that is required by law to comply with the act.
I dont know how anyone could interpret the act in any other way. It is all there in plain English.
Thats quality consulting you were providing to Exetel
Ann: Wangle Suspension Update, page-174
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 258 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FGL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.776M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100000 | 2.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6¢ | 1513 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 07.00am 12/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FGL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable