Ann: Warrior Project Update Heritage Clearance Received, page-78

First 78 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
will do

8,620 Posts.

547

14/06/21

08:24

Post #: 53826178
Share

Originally posted by GT3loui: ↑

To balance tendies viewpoint, I am quite optimistic about our Calwest cross/sovereign hill.

DEV's surveys time and time again show anomalies that are worth pursuing ( no pun intended), and DEV's exploration campaign
is highly focused on that area.

As Tretch and many others have said, mineralization does not end at a tenement border.
I like to think this is the case of The sovereign complex, which for me, clearly is shared by our eastern and southern cross arms.
As others have mentioned, ripe foe a DEV/PUR JV.
See below-

Hudson -Displays its best Pt,Pd and Cu results , the closer their AEM, rock chip or drill to our northern and eastern cross arms.
Kingsley- Displays its best gravity and AEM Cu results, the closer to our northern and eastern cross arms and 1 sample of high Pd/Pt.
Mackenzie-Displays their best Pd/Pt and Cu results, the closer they get to our southern cross arm.

Additionally, if you look at the upper photo and continue to follow the Julimar anomaly from Gonneville, through Hartog, Baudin ,Jansz and follow it up to the north west, basically ending up at Caspin's Yarrawindah Brook, it comes reasonably close to the eastern cross arm.
I have drawn a line through the julimar anomaly to highlight this.

So, we know that Chalice, who are the most experienced in the area, believe Gonneville is part of a much larger system and have stated that there is widespread mineralization, particularly in the western boundary of the Yilgarn Craton. We know that the mineralisation in this area tends to run North/South.
Our cross tennement is in this highly prospective area, has proven AEM, rock chip, gravity and bauxite drilling analysis, right up to our border.

So, IMHO, I am betting we will find something in the cross. It might not be as obvious as Phil's Hill/Cal east from initial analysis, but I reckon there's something there.

I'm no geo, just my viewpoint and I kook forward to a promising future with PUR.

Good luck everyone.

Expand

Nice to see we may have 2 minds alike thinking that the trend of mineralisation is not limited alone to CHN JULIMAR project.

In my post on the CAL East thread I drew a similar trending line in my post # 53766037 suggesting that mineralisation is widespread even further to the east, CVV, DEV, MAN, CPN and PURs Cal East have some form of PGEs , Ni and Cu readings in soil samples or drilling results.

PUR Price at posting: 7.9¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
20 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply