Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??
The Drudge report times out.
- Forums
- NZX - By Stock
- MCK
- Ann: WAV/RULE: MCK: Waiver from NZX Main Board Listing Rule 5.2.3
MCK
millennium & copthorne hotels new zealand limited
Add to My Watchlist
2.37%
!
$2.88

Ann: WAV/RULE: MCK: Waiver from NZX Main Board Listing Rule 5.2.3
-
-
Share
These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Metals & Mining SECTOR NEWS
Global Rights to Transformative Technology for PV Solar Cell Recycling Secured
18 Jun 2025 LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITEDLU7 acquires global rights to transformative PV recycling technology from Macquarie University, targeting higher material recoveries from solar waste and backed by $1.7M in investor commitments. The technology... Read more
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
regards
Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.
http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.
Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.
My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.
It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.
So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
Shame on many of you.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000
Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.
Feeling sick enough yet?
Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.
So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!
Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?
To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- Release Date: 24/03/16 17:15
- Summary: WAV/RULE: MCK: Waiver from NZX Main Board Listing Rule 5.2.3
- Price Sensitive: No
- Download Document 7.06KB
MCK 24/03/2016 17:15 WAV/RULE NOT PRICE SENSITIVE REL: 1715 HRS Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited WAV/RULE: MCK: Waiver from NZX Main Board Listing Rule 5.2.3 NZX Regulation Decision Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (MCK) Application for waiver from NZX Main Board Listing Rule 5.2.3 24 March 2016 Decision 1.Subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 2 below, and on the basis that the information provided by Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (MCK) is complete and accurate in all material respects, NZX Regulation (NZXR) grants MCK a waiver from Rule 5.2.3 in respect of its Preference Shares for a period of twelve months from 25 March 2016 to allow MCK to have fewer than 25% of the Preference Shares held by less than 500 Members of the Public holding at least a Minimum Holding. 2.The waiver in paragraph 1 above is provided on the conditions that: a.the Directors of MCK certify to NZXR, in a form acceptable to NZXR, that allowing the Preference Shares to remain quoted is in the best interests of holders of the Preference Shares; b.MCK clearly and prominently discloses the waiver, its conditions, and the implications in its half-year and annual reports; c.MCK consistently monitors the total number of Members of the Public holding Preference Shares and the percentage of Preference Shares held by Members of the Public holding at least a Minimum Holding and provides NZXR with quarterly updates from the date the waiver is granted during the period of the waiver, such updates to be provided to NZXR within ten business days of the end of each quarter; and d. MCK notifies NZXR as soon as practicable if there are any material changes to the total number of Members of the Public holding Preference Shares, and/or the percentage of Preference Shares held by Members of the Public. 3.The information on which this decision is based is set out in Appendix One to this decision. This waiver will not apply if that information is not or ceases to be full and accurate in all material respects. 4.The Rules to which this decision relates are set out in Appendix Two to this decision. 5. Capitalised terms that are not defined in this decision have the meanings given to them in the Rules. Reasons 6.In coming to the decision to provide the waiver set out in paragraph 1 above, MCK has submitted, and NZXR has no reason not to accept, that: a.the Capital Reduction Scheme undertaken in July 2014 contributed to the decline in spread since the 2014 Waiver was granted. MCK has advised that since the Capital Reduction Scheme was implemented, there has not been a significant decrease in the number of Preference Shareholders; b.eight custodians and nominees hold Preference Shares. Accordingly, MCK has submitted that the underlying number of Members of the Public holding the Preference Shares is likely to be greater than the number of Members of the Public registered as holders of the Preference Shares; c.in the absence of a waiver from Rule 5.2.3, MCK would be unable to comply with Rule 5.2.3 and could not continue to quote the Preference Shares. MCK submits that compliance with Rule 5.2.3 is outside of the control of MCK and its Directors; d.holders of the Preference Shares will not be disadvantaged by the granting of the waiver. Further, the condition in paragraph 2(a) provides NZXR with additional comfort that it is in the best interests of holders of the Preference Shares to allow the Preference Shares to remain quoted on the basis that holders will remain entitled to the protections afforded by the Rules, and a constitution that reflects those protections; e.the condition contained in paragraph 2(b) above will provide access to information for both existing holders of the Preference Shares, as well as those wishing to trade in the Preference Shares, of this waiver and its implications for the Preference Shares; f.the condition contained in paragraph 2(c) above will ensure that NZXR is able to monitor any material changes in MCK's spread over the period of the waiver; and g.the waiver is granted for a period of 12 months. This gives NZXR the opportunity to reconsider the spread of the Preference Shares in 12 months' time if MCK considers a waiver is still required. Appendix One 1.Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (MCK) is a Listed Issuer with ordinary Shares and Preference Shares Quoted on the NZX Main Board. 2. MCK undertook a pro rata renounceable offer (Offer) of redeemable Preference Shares (Preference Shares) to all holders of MCK's ordinary Shares, pursuant to a simplified disclosure prospectus (SDP) dated 17 February 2014. 3.The SDP under which the Offer of Preference Shares was made included a disclosure of the liquidity risk. 4.The Offer closed on 19 March 2014 at which point MCK became aware that it would not meet the spread requirements of NZX Main Board Listing Rule (Rule) 5.2.3 in respect of the Preference Shares. 5.On 25 March 2014, being the date of Quotation of the Preference Shares, a total of 206 Members of the Public held 14.8% of the Preference Shares on issue. 6.In July 2014, MCK undertook a capital reduction by way of scheme of arrangement (Capital Reduction Scheme). Between the initial announcement of the Capital Reduction Scheme on 4 June 2014, and its implementation on 17 July 2014, the number of holders of Preference Shares decreased from 207 to 184. 7.As at 6 March 2015, a total of 176 Members of the Public held 8.4% of the Preference Shares on issue, with six custodians and nominees holding Preference Shares. 8.Rule 5.2.3 provides that a Class of Securities will generally not be considered for Quotation on the NZX Main Board unless those Securities are held by at least 500 Members of the Public holding at least 25% of the Securities of that Class issued. 9.On 4 April 2014, NZXR granted MCK a waiver from Rule 5.2.3 for a period of`12 months from 25 March 2014. This waiver was then extended for a period of 12 months from 25 March 2015. 10.As at 4 March 2016 171 Members of the Public hold 8.4% of the Preference Shares on issue, with eight custodians and nominees holding Preference Shares. 11.While Aberdeen Asset Management Limited (Aberdeen) holds 6.4% of the Preference Shares, Aberdeen is not considered to be a Member of the Public for the purposes of the Rules on the basis that Aberdeen holds more than 10% of the ordinary Shares in MCK. 12. MCK has applied for an extension of the 2015 Waiver from Rule from Rule 5.2.3 in respect of the Preference Shares for a further 12 months from 25 March 2016. Appendix Two Rule 5.2 Quotation of Securities 5.2.3 A Class of Securities will generally not be considered for Quotation on the NZSX or NZDX unless those Securities are held by at least 500 Members of the Public holding at least 25% of the number of Securities of that Class issued, with each Member of the Public holding at least a Minimum Holding, and those requirements are maintained, or NZX is otherwise satisfied that the Issuer will maintain a spread of Security holders which is sufficient to ensure that there is a sufficiently liquid market in the Class of Securities. End CA:00279876 For:MCK Type:WAV/RULE Time:2016-03-24 17:15:55
-
-
Share
We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!
I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.
The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.
Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!
30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
(0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
(0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
(0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Right now, imo it's a buy.
What does that have to do with anything else?
Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper
If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?
It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.
However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,
Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.
Cheers
OI NQ , how they hanging?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview
piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
Posted by bigdump
IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview
so who should be ashamed of themselves
it squite ironic !
Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview
fark u 2 fool ramper
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
Posted by trade4profit
IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview
diatribe...
Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...
---
Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
Posted by bendigo
Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview
Good announcement today
Promising new company
Good board
Good territory
go the ASX website & check out the announcment.
Cheers
Bendigo
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
Posted by NR
Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
Posted by Dezneva
Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.
---
These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.
Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."
Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!
How do you explain that?
Cheers!
The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
Posted by Rocker
IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview
well picked up T4P
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
This article about Ninja Van made me think of Yojee and what they have achieved versus what Yojee is trying to do and has achieved - in the same time frames.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/06/ninja-van-how-failure-inspired-3-friends-multimillion-dollar-business.html
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.
Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.
Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.
It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.
Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.
Read more here.
http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO
Looks good for next week. Be prepared!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Lots of reading today!
So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......
[email protected]
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
The Watchlist
MEM
MEMPHASYS LIMITED.
Professor John Aitken, Scientific Director
Professor John Aitken
Scientific Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online