- Release Date: 22/02/12 14:40
- Summary: WAV/RULE: PGC: PGC - Waiver from NZSX Listing Rule 3.3.1(c) and 3.6.2(c)
- Price Sensitive: No
- Download Document 8.46KB
PGC 22/02/2012 12:40 WAV/RULE REL: 1240 HRS Pyne Gould Corporation Limited WAV/RULE: PGC: PGC - Waiver from NZSX Listing Rule 3.3.1(c) and 3.6.2(c) 22 February 2012 NZX Market Supervision Decision Pyne Gould Corporation Limited Application for Waiver from NZSX Listing Rule 3.3.1(c)and 3.6.2 (c) Background 1.Pyne Gould Corporation Limited ("PGC") is an NZSX Listed Issuer. 2.On 31 January 2012, Bruce Irvine, an Independent Director of PGC, resigned from the Board of PGC. Mr Irvine also resigned as a member of the Audit Committee of PGC. 3.On 15 February 2012, PGC announced that it had appointed Messrs Naylor and Tinkler to the PGC Board and that: "following the 30th of March and when we know the outcome of the Australian Equity Partners Fund No 1 LP ("AEP") takeover offer we will appoint a further Independent Director to replace Mr Irvine. We have suitable candidates in mind but need to understand the final percentage shareholding AEP will achieve and whether or not PGC remains listed on the NZSX." 4.Following the resignation of Mr Irvine and the appointment of Messrs Naylor and Tinkler, the composition of the Board and Audit Committee of PGC is now as follows: Board Bryan Mogridge (Chairman) George Kerr John Duncan Michael Tinkler Russell Naylor Audit Committee Bryan Mogridge Russell Naylor John Duncan 5.NZSX Listing Rule ("Rule") 3.3.1(c) requires that the Board of an Issuer (where there are fewer than eight Directors) have a minimum of two Independent Directors. As a result of Mr Irvine's resignation, PGC currently only has one Independent Director, being Mr Mogridge, and therefore does not meet the requirements of Rule 3.3.1(c). 6.Rule 3.6.2(c) requires that the Audit Committee of an Issuer be comprised of a majority of Independent Directors. Mr Mogridge is the only Independent Director on the Audit Committee, therefore PGC does not meet the requirements of Rule 3.6.2(c). Application 7.PGC seeks temporary waivers until 30 April 2012, from Rules 3.3.1(c), and 3.6.2(c) to allow: (a) the PGC Board to have one Independent Director, instead of the two required by Rule 3.3.1(c); and (b) the PGC Audit Committee to have one Independent Director, instead of being comprised as required by Rule 3.6.2(c). 8.In support of its application, PGC submits that: (a)although Mr Irvine had previously indicated that he wished to resign as a director of PGC in due course, PGC was unaware of there being any urgency in this respect, and the discussion of the proposed resignation was deferred, following the receipt of the takeover offer from AEP. PGC's expectation was that Mr Irvine would remain as a Director of PGC until the end of February 2012. As such, it was unexpected when Mr Irvine advised in mid-January 2012 that he wished to resign in the near future (culminating in the notice given on 20 January 2012 of his resignation with effect from 31 January 2012) due to the requirements of Mr Irvine's other directorships. That said, at the time, PGC nevertheless considered that it could secure a suitable replacement Independent Director in a relatively short period of time; (b)however, the position became more difficult when the closing date of the takeover offer of AEP was extended. The closing date was 31 January 2012, but was extended (on 31 January) to 15 February, and then (on 14 February) to 30 March. AEP currently has acceptances for more than 65% of PGC shares. If AEP received acceptances for more than 90% of PGC shares by 30 March 2012, then (in accordance with the Takeovers Code) AEP will be required to acquire all remaining PGC shares, and PGC will be delisted from the Main Board market operated by NZX Limited ("NZSX"). Although, at the time of notice being given of Mr Irvine's planned resignation, it was relatively clear that AEP would not reach that level of acceptances by 31 January 2012, the extension of the offer to 30 March 2012 means this possibility cannot be discounted. PGC's experience is that, in the current environment, it is difficult to find suitable Independent Directors, but this difficulty is compounded for PGC by AEP's ongoing takeover offer, and by the possibility now that PGC may delist from the NZSX, such that any appointment of a replacement Independent Director may only be for a matter of a few weeks; (c)PGC recognises that the appointment of a replacement for Mr Irvine needs to be completed as quickly as possible. The PGC Board has been actively considering potential candidates, and does have a candidate in mind. However, PGC also considers that any candidate needs sufficient time to assess the company and the opportunity before agreeing to the appointment. PGC's experience is that it is difficult to convince potential candidates to undertake this due diligence in light of the matters discussed in paragraph 8(b); (d)having regard to the matters discussed in paragraphs 8(b) and 8(c), PGC therefore requests that it be given until 30 April 2012 to replace Mr Irvine, which will provide PGC with one month after the closing date of AEP's takeover to secure a replacement Independent Director. This is consistent with the three month period that has been granted in respect of the other waivers discussed at paragraph 8(g), in that the period expires three months after Mr Irvine's resignation; (e)the waivers sought are temporary in nature and would expire on the sooner of a replacement Independent Director being appointed by the PGC Board, or on 30 April 2012; (f)as a replacement Independent Director is expected to be appointed to the Board no later than 30 April 2012, the Independent Director would be involved in any Audit Committee meetings associated with the completion of PGC's financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2012; and (g)NZX Market Supervision ("NZXMS") has previously granted waivers in similar circumstances, including to Dorchester Pacific Limited (6 September 2010), Skellerup Holdings Limited (15 July 2010), New Image Group Limited (27 October 2009), and Widespread Portfolios Limited (28 November 2008). Rules 9.Rule 3.3.1(c) provides as follows: "the minimum number of Independent Directors shall be two, or if there are eight or more Directors, three or one-third (rounded down to the nearest whole number of Directors) of the total number of Directors, whichever is the greater." 10.Rule 3.6.2(c) provides as follows: "The Audit Committee shall: ... (c) have a majority of members that are Independent Directors; and ..." Decision 11.On the basis that the information provided by PGC to NZXMS is complete and accurate in all respects, NZXMS grants PGC a temporary waiver until 30 April 2012 from the requirements of Rules 3.3.1(c) and 3.6.2(c) on the following conditions: (a)that the Independent Director and chairman of PGC certify to NZXMS that he considers that the absence of an additional Independent Director from the Board and Audit Committee of PGC until 30 April 2012 will not prejudice shareholders of PGC; and (b)PGC's annual report that relates to the period for which PGC relies on this waiver will contain a description of this waiver and disclose the period within which PGC's Board and Audit Committee did not meet the requirements of Rule 3.3.1(c) and 3.6.2(c). Reasons 12.In coming to the decision to grant PGC a temporary waiver from Rules 3.3.1(c) and 3.6.2(c), NZXMS considered the following: (a)NZXMS accepts that it is difficult for PGC to appoint an Independent Director until the outcome of the AEP takeover is known; (b)the AEP takeover has been extended to the maximum extent possible and cannot be further extended beyond 30 March 2012. Independent Directors play a minimal role at this stage of the takeover process and NZXMS has consulted with the Takeovers Panel regarding the waiver decision; and (c)the conditions contained in paragraph 11 will ensure that shareholders have oversight of PGC's non-compliance with Rules 3.3.1(c) and 3.6.2(b) and are not unduly prejudiced by PGC's failure to comply with those Rules. 13.NZXMS reminds Issuers that in accordance with footnote 2 to Rule 1.11.4, retrospective waivers will only be considered in exceptional circumtances where a minor or inadvertent breach by an Issuer would incur severe consequences for the Issuer if the application were not considered. Where an Issuer anticipates that it will be in breach of the Rules, or it comes to an Issuer's attention that it is currently in breach of the Rules, NZXMS reminds Issuers that the best course of action is to discuss the situation with NZXMS as soon as possible. End CA:00219863 For:PGC Type:WAV/RULE Time:2012-02-22 12:40:21
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?