Ann: WE5 Production Test Update, page-74

@@psi81
I second that. This is not a tight reservoir.

10% was the "average" porosity. They also encountered high porosity/permeability zones within that reservoir. Mud invasion, however, would be more pronounced/pervasive in the high perm zones - so if mud invasion was Xm in the "tighter" sands, it would be 10*Xm in the stuff they showed us in the pics back in July. So the gas would need to push more "mud" out of the way in order to enter the well bore in the more permeable zones. So maybe were not getting much gas production out of the more permeable zones.

Given the extent of mud cake impact, I wonder to what extent the log responses have been "masked" by mud invasion?