@@psi81
I second that. This is not a tight reservoir.
10% was the "average" porosity. They also encountered high porosity/permeability zones within that reservoir. Mud invasion, however, would be more pronounced/pervasive in the high perm zones - so if mud invasion was Xm in the "tighter" sands, it would be 10*Xm in the stuff they showed us in the pics back in July. So the gas would need to push more "mud" out of the way in order to enter the well bore in the more permeable zones. So maybe were not getting much gas production out of the more permeable zones.
Given the extent of mud cake impact, I wonder to what extent the log responses have been "masked" by mud invasion?
@@psi81I second that. This is not a tight reservoir. 10% was the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 176 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
23.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.13%) |
Mkt cap ! $659.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 23.5¢ | 24.8¢ | 23.0¢ | $3.083M | 12.91M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 825367 | 23.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 23.5¢ | 303948 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 11/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |