is it the fact that they’ve taken an image that looks like it could’ve been from radiopaedia and have had to maximise it for a presentation that it makes it look misleading?
when a clinician makes an assessment, would they not need to blow it up to make sense or try and make sense of what the image is and thus doing the same thing as what Andreas has done - mind you I don’t think the big man would be making the presos…
I’ve scoured cyc investor presos, can’t seem to find an image they consider to be a good scan of nuc:vq… happy to be directed to one by cyc if I’ve missed it!
cheers,
heavy
is it the fact that they’ve taken an image that looks like it...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
99.5¢ |
Change
-0.020(1.97%) |
Mkt cap ! $110.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.02 | $1.02 | 99.5¢ | $33.22K | 33.09K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9999 | 99.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.02 | 5274 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CYC (ASX) Chart |