No, they said clearly its retrospective no future talk.whilst...

No, they said clearly its retrospective no future talk.

whilst James asked Clary my question about mri, it was clary who didnt really address it correctly, or perhaps james didnt ask it perfectly - why did the 2a have good mri if the drug doesnt work?

clary talked about the mysterious and powerful effects of placebo, but didnt touch on the mri from 2a which, for many, is how we came into this nightmare failure. Without the mri from 2a would i be here? Maybe, especially with voits comments and supportive cd49d data.

but key concerns were cleared up, and the drug did activate cd49d responses, just didnt help move the needle. This was always my concern... in the back of my mind so... i guess the 20% chance of failure I foresaw played out like a monster.

whilst I still think there may have been some key info omitted here and there to pump the stock, it appears to have failed all by itself. Tough lesson learnt.