Supermajor, you've raised a number of good points. I think there would be a variety of opinions here on what constitutes material or newsworthy developments throughout the G-3 drilling. It's pretty clear that their comm's fall well short of comprehensive but I've accepted that that's the way they do things and I've remained a holder. But I do think they crossed the line on G-3 which they clearly intended as an appraisal-cum-exploration well but packaged it as primarily a development well. I see no reason why they couldn't have put their cards on the table from the outset; then people wouldn't have felt misled. I suspect they've been given the message loud and clear by now that their approach was the wrong one, and I sure hope they've listened.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?