Added the collars and a quick visual of the results in the announcement. Need to clean up my data base as getting messy and confusing. Lot of work and not easy with so many different ways to look at data. WA1 present it well enough but I find actually working with the data can give a better feel for what is going on...sometimes and only from an outsider's perspective.
As an ENR SH I was intrigued by holes 67 and 68. Not high Nb but significant intersection lengths close to the boundary. Then there is ENR's Emily carbonatite intersections some 3 Kms to the NW adding some interest to the picture. I do not expect there to be a direct connection between Luni and Emily, at surface anyway, given no Carb lithologies announced between these two areas. Perhaps more to the south.
Geophysics is proving to be both useful and not obviously useful.
Useful to target Luni as a gravity feature but then something happens such that some carbonatite does/does not have gravity/mag signatures. Work in progress. The drill doesn't care.
WA1 have drilled two gravity spikes to the west of Luni. Interesting in the context of the Emily prospect where carbonatite shows up around 40m down inclined holes 95 6 8 and open onto WA1 ground - apparently.
Symbols
Triangles reported holes in last announcement WA1
Larger 30+m intersections (DYOR as the criteria changed slightly as I developed this and grade aspects)
White no reported assays; Yellow sub 1; Amber/orange 1+; red high
Concentric red orange circles recent satellite interpreted drilling on top of holes contemporary with the ones reported in the announcement.
Detail of south central Luni GE data dump
As with the margin of many deposits a lot of drilling is required to fine tune boundaries of lithology and grade.
Hole 77, drilled south, was reported as country rock but just to the north is hole 173 with good grades in thinner zones. Perhaps as suggested before they spun the rig around on the 77 site and drilled north to define these higher grades.
Are the white triangles associated with country rock or carb. with no grade.
For interest a roughly annotated geophysical image from ENR's Emily/Luni area work
ENR's reported Falcon Gravity north of the property line shows the much higher resolution available [They did overfly Luni because survey constraints made it pragmatic to do so. Informed WA1 apparently but have chosen not to release the data. Comment at AGM. Wasting money to fly ground held by someone else so no point in doing so unless survey parameters make if more practical]
The Emily carbonatite is actually a mag low where they observed WA1 results showing possible deeper weathering and decided to punch in a fence of holes. Got lucky? So much carbonatite around it will be interesting to see what the future brings. Better be some Nb, REEs, phosphates in more than Luni.
Not intended as cross promotion with a boundary line possibly splitting Luni into 5% or so on the northern side with most of the goodies on WA1 ground. ENR like their chances with the NE trend from Luni east where an arcuate geophysical anomaly extending kilometers gives some hope for them.
(20min delay)