Sorry @rexsh, your comment doesn't make sense to me.
They would not have called upon Aztech and incurred what one could only assume to be a significant additional expense if they had all the tools necessary to do it themselves.
This (to me) by definition would make it an STX specific problem that they were unable/unsure on how to solve on their own.
This is not a criticism nor a bad thing as it shows that they are not too proud to ask for help when help is available. To do otherwise would be a display of contempt, particularly toward STX shareholders..
I don't think @Tooter 's comments can be considered mud slinging, particularly when the operator themselves announced and acknowledged their (Aztech's) involvement was required.
Sorry @rexsh, your comment doesn't make sense to me. They would...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
28.0¢ |
Change
0.030(12.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $801.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 24.5¢ | 28.3¢ | 24.5¢ | $7.221M | 26.82M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 293004 | 27.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 28.0¢ | 820079 | 16 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |